(Minghui.org) I am a 71-year-old Falun Dafa practitioner. Every day I go out and clarify the truth. I am particularly moved by how Master arranges for me to meet people as long as I do my best to tell them about Dafa and the persecution.
I met a man of about 30 near the entrance to my apartment building on November 3, 2021. He was sitting on an electric bike looking at his cell phone. I greeted him and wished him well and then I began to talk to him about Falun Dafa.
When he asked me where I lived, I thought he might be an undercover police officer, so instead of telling him where I lived, I asked him for his address. He told me that he lived in the same area and that his grandmother was a faithful believer in the Buddha. He also said that he’d once read Master Li Hongzhi’s lectures.
After we talked for a while and I was sure he was not a plainclothes policeman, I felt more relaxed and kept talking about Falun Dafa. I told him about how precious it was to cultivate in Falun Dafa and how Jiang Zemin and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) staged the Tiananmen Square Self-Immolation. I made sure to let him know about organ harvesting from living practitioners.
I also told him about the prophecies that predicted that Heaven would disintegrate the CCP and how the coronavirus pandemic targeted the CCP. “Only by believing that ‘Falun Dafa is good, Truthfulness-Compassion-Forbearance is good’ will people be able to remain safe amidst the pandemic,” I said.
When the man asked why the CCP slandered Master Li, I said, “Do not believe the CCP propaganda—there is no truth in it! Master Li is here to save sentient beings!” He was shocked to learn how Falun Dafa has been denigrated and slandered and agreed that Dafa was indeed good and that the CCP would be destroyed.
When I asked if he’d ever joined the CCP, he said, “No, I never became a Party member, but I did join the Youth League. I quit that, though.” We talked some more and then parted ways.
A thought suddenly hit me, “What did he mean when he said he’d “already quit the Youth League?” Did he think he’d automatically quit when he came of age? Well, that wouldn’t work because that did not imply that he had truly quit. So, I turned around, approached him again, and asked him just how he’d quit the Youth League. He said, “I quit the Youth League online.” I felt better knowing that he’d registered to quit on the Epoch Times website. This would be acknowledged by gods.
I realized that he knew a lot about Falun Dafa from talking to another practitioner who had clarified the truth to him. He also learned a lot from bypassing the Great Firewall of China to access overseas information.
He told me, “Did you know I was actually here waiting for you? I had a dream not long ago about this exact scenario—a lady walked up to me to clarify the truth. That lady was you! I wanted to know if this would come true, so I came over here to wait for you. This was the third day I’ve waited here for you. Although you didn’t come the first two days, you did today. It was all exactly the same as in my dream!”
“Then who started the conversation today?” I asked.
“You, of course!” he said. We both laughed.
This young man had good enlightenment ability and was able to differentiate between good and evil. Although he had already quit the CCP’s youth organizations, he still yearned to learn more about Dafa. He even took his dream seriously and waited for me for three days! I told him that hearing the truth about Dafa was very meaningful and that only by thinking well of Dafa would he have a bright and safe future.
This incident shows that human beings have a side that wants to learn the truth about Falun Dafa. This knowledge makes Dafa practitioners shoulder a great responsibility! We need to be more focused and patient and strive to clarify the truth better. Only by cultivating compassion and being persistent when we clarify the truth can we save sentient beings and help them improve their moral standard.
All articles, graphics, and content published on Minghui.org are copyrighted. Non-commercial reproduction is allowed but requires attribution with the article title and a link to the original article.