My View on the Minghui Editorial “Notice Regarding Suing Jiang”

(Minghui.org) I have the following thoughts after reading the Minghui editorial Notice Regarding Suing Jiang:

1. We should always remember Master Li's teaching in What Does it Mean to “Help Master Rectify the Fa”? in The Essentials in Diligent Progress (Vol. III),

“However great your idea may seem, it is limited to only this one plane of existence, this singular spot, and that one particular matter. And could you possibly know what impact that thing which Master wants done is meant to have at countless, immeasurable planes of utterly massive cosmic bodies?”

We should follow and complete Master's suggestion well without any reservation. We should not guess and entertain our human notions.

Master Li taught us in Fa Teaching Given at the 2015 New York Fa Conference,

“Indeed, it should be sued (enthusiastic applause from the disciples); all of humanity should sue it.”

Thus we should sue Jiang. Don't use human notions to guess what events might ultimately transpire, in politics for example, or presume how the persecution may end. We should not dwell on these things.

I believe that we should sue Jiang simply because he should be sued. Some fellow practitioners thought, “With the large number of people suing Jiang, China's current ruler will arrest him and return Falun Gong's good reputation.” I believe that such thinking is wrong.

Master Li wrote, “I hope that everyone will do as above” below the Minghui editorial. So we just follow the editorial without reservation or human notions. There are boundless inner meanings in what Master Li asks us to do.

2. One should look inward if he has any additional thoughts after reading the notice. For example, some practitioners who signed criminal report forms with their real personal information are a bit worried now after reading the notice. I believe that they should think over whether they did what they did following human notions. Did they feel they needed to jump on the bandwagon, for example, so as to not be left behind?

3. For practitioners who may have exposed their identities unnecessarily, do they feel critical of Minghui for not publishing the notice sooner?” I believe that it is no coincidence that the notice was published at this particular time.

4. The number of complaints filed against Jiang each day has been less over the last one or two weeks. Four months have passed since we began suing Jiang en masse. Many practitioners who wished to file lawsuits have already done so. Those who have not sued Jiang probably do not wish to reveal their personal information to the Party. The notice states that using pseudonym to report Jiang's crimes is fine. I hope that fellow practitioners who have not reported Jiang's crimes take action to do what Master Li asks us to do.

5. Suing Jiang is what we should do, but not the only thing we do. While participating in the movement to sue Jiang, we should work harder to clarify the truth to save more sentient beings. I know some practitioners like to send righteous thoughts at home, instead of explaining the facts face to face and distributing materials. Master Li taught us in Fa Teaching Given in Manhattan in 2006, “The intensity of our clarifying the truth should grow only greater and greater, so you mustn’t let up—you absolutely must not.”